Welcome!
E.A.9.11
About This Group
Started on March 21, 2002
Ended on April 12, 2002
15 members, 177 messages

Featured Discussions:
How 9.11 Changed My       Life
Appreciating E.A.9.11
Can War End Terrorism?
Is Patriotism Patriotic?
[Read More...]


 
> About E.A.9.11
> Resources
> Press
> Shout Outs
> The Team
> FAQ
> Get Started
> Contact Us
 


Freedom of Expression (messages 1-3)  
Previous Next All messages Group Home

a.j  05:33pm Apr 4, 2002 EST 1 of 3
Are we really given the right to freedom of expression? I know that screaming fire in a crowded building is wrong but are we really allowed to exercise our right of freedom?

julzie  10:44pm Apr 5, 2002 EST 2 of 3
I think we are to an extent. The morals of society decide to what levels of freedom we are allowed to exercise.

Paul F  04:17am Apr 7, 2002 EST 3 of 3
Yep. The government has little respect for the Constitution and they're going to reinterpret it so that only what "society" believes is right (with most of the people who were enough within the system to get elected to office qualifying as members of "society", or at least as people who listen to "society") will get protected as something people have the "freedom" to say. In other words, there's not much "freedom" at all, people.

In a matter of fact, the very image of "shouting 'fire' in a crowded theater" came from a Supreme Court ruling in favor of a flagrantly unconstitutional law against free speech. Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, in defense of the Supreme Court's 1918 ruling in favor of the Sedition Act, that "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic ... The question in every case is whether the words ... create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent". And all the while this was brought about when Eugene Debs (followed by Charles Schenck) went to jail merely for trashing the United States and the war and took it all the way to the Supreme Court -- their shouts were hardly a "false" declaration of fire, nor the phosphorus for a "clear and present danger". Basically the Supreme Court ruled, at least temporarily, there there was for all intents and purposes no First Amendment.


Copyright 2002, Global Kids, Inc. | Privacy Policy
Small Group Dialogue software from Web Lab